Posted by
tatarlak on Thursday, August 21, 2008 3:22:14 PM
The long and tedious road to the working class in Europe increasingly resembles a setback in the field of rights and freedoms, with increasing clarity is the way that politicians of the European Union wants to highlight the working class of This integrated Europe, but I refer to the evidence.
Based on the complaint made already in the article "The humanitarian crisis in Europe" I can only follow the trail of events that live in old Europe rights framework with initiatives such as increasing the workday from 48 hours per week to a maximum of 65 hours, this represents a harsh blow to the 35-hour day and reconciling family life with working life.
The question is why take such measures?, What can apaliar these measures? According to European leaders such measures are to be competitive with products from emerging countries, in many cases where productivity is over workers' rights.
I believe that measures like this the only thing they do is divide the working class more vulnerable to employers, creating cracks between trade unions and workers, distancing views in a society in the economic strangulation to an employee who is charged with debts due to the high cost of living in this society we have created.
That's why I think we have a moral obligation as citizens of Europe not to allow this type of legislation, our heirs children, grandchildren, great grandchildren will not be remembered as the generation that Involución socially without saying anything. We must protest in a peaceful but firm in order to improve society we are creating, do a better tomorrow for all models by creating productive assimilated by third countries that guarantee some basic rights to workers and move towards improving working conditions , Social and productive.
Another clear proof that we are going back guarantees and rights is the new Italian legislation against illegal emigration such laws the only thing it does is check out even more to the already weak third world citizen fleeing hunger and misery of their countries where home is doomed to die of hunger because of some corrupt agents or endless wars that eternizan unresolved.
If they reach Europe, specifically Italy are treated as criminals for having reached an illegal, what ideas we are exporting to third world countries?, What can they think of us?, It is regrettable that this permit kind of legislation in a member country of the European Union, although it was clear that Italy follows in the footsteps leaving the European Union.
In conclusion I would like to refer to the FAO summit where there is neither came to a minimal agreement which is a hard blow to all those who are homeless in third world countries and a long increase in the mortality rate in these countries, this should make us reflect on what we are doing wrong and destructive if this pace is sustainable in the long term or is another clear sign of deterioration in modern societies that should change its priorities in order to achieve global solutions that affect us all if we let die of hunger so that they will be considered outlawed in Italy or the European directives regarding illegal emigration harden, will continue without more coming if we do not provide reasonable solutions from rich countries If not we give them alternatives in their home countries, but there we invest to create better societies. So I hope that later was extended earlier this situation, and the system change